The very fabric hugging your curves is doing more to keep those love handles in place than your carb addiction ever could. Yes, I’m talking about polyester, spandex, and other workout gear materials. They might as well come with a label reading, "Weight Gain Guaranteed!"
You are plunging into ice baths, twisting into pretzels on yoga mats, and fueling up on ancestral tonics, but all that health hustle is getting wrapped up in a dirty little secret: polyester.
Polyester clothing creates conditions on the skin that promote the growth of unfavorable bacteria while suppressing beneficial bacteria, leading to various skin and health issues. The impact of polyester on the skin microbiome is primarily due to its synthetic nature, which affects moisture retention, breathability, friction, and microbial interactions.
Here’s a detailed explanation of how polyester influences bacterial subspecies, overgrowth, and suppression, and how these changes can affect skin health, sebum production, acne, bacterial vaginosis, and more.
1. Promotion of Unfavorable Bacterial Subspecies
Polyester is a synthetic, non-breathable fabric that tends to trap heat and moisture, creating an ideal environment for certain bacteria to thrive, particularly those that prefer low-oxygen (anaerobic) and moist environments. Some of the bacteria that tend to proliferate on skin covered by polyester include:
Corynebacterium spp. This genus includes subspecies such as Corynebacterium striatum and Corynebacterium jeikeium. These bacteria are known for producing volatile sulfur compounds, contributing significantly to body odor. Polyester’s ability to trap moisture and sweat makes it easier for these bacteria to grow. In addition, Corynebacterium species can outcompete other, less odor-causing bacteria on the skin, leading to a distinct and often unpleasant odor profile.
Staphylococcus aureus
This pathogen can thrive under polyester clothing, particularly when moisture is retained. Overgrowth of Staphylococcus aureus can lead to skin infections, such as folliculitis (infection of hair follicles), impetigo, and more severe conditions like cellulitis. In cases where there is already an imbalance in the skin microbiome, S. aureus can easily take over, especially in warm, moist environments.
Propionibacterium acnes (now Cutibacterium acnes) This bacterium is naturally found on human skin. Under normal conditions, it helps maintain skin health by breaking down sebum (the oily substance produced by sebaceous glands). However, the anaerobic conditions created by polyester clothing can lead to an overgrowth of C. acnes. When trapped in pores, C. acnes metabolizes sebum into fatty acids, which are irritating to the skin and can lead to inflammation and acne development, particularly in areas where polyester clothing is tight and does not allow the skin to breathe.
2. Suppression of Beneficial Bacteria
Staphylococcus epidermidis This bacterium is a beneficial skin commensal that competes with pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus. S. epidermidis helps modulate the skin’s immune responses and produces antimicrobial peptides that keep pathogenic bacteria in check. However, polyester’s moisture-retaining properties can create an environment that is less favorable for S. epidermidis and more favorable for S. aureus, leading to a reduction in the beneficial species and an increase in the pathogenic ones.
Lactobacillus spp. On the skin and in the vaginal microbiome, lactobacilli (such as Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners) are crucial for maintaining a healthy, low-pH environment that prevents the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria. Polyester's moisture-trapping properties can disrupt this balance, promoting an environment where Lactobacillus species are less dominant.
This can lead to conditions like bacterial vaginosis (BV), where there is an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae.
3. Impact on Sebum and Skin Conditions
Sebum Production and Acne Polyester traps moisture and heat, which can cause the skin to sweat more. The accumulation of sweat can mix with sebum, creating an environment that promotes the growth of Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes). As C. acnes breaks down sebum, it releases fatty acids that irritate the skin, leading to inflammation, clogged pores, and acne. Additionally, polyester fabrics may cause mechanical irritation due to their rough texture, exacerbating acne by causing micro-abrasions on the skin that can become inflamed or infected.
Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Polyester underwear can disrupt the vaginal microbiome by creating a warm, moist environment that reduces the population of beneficial lactobacilli, which normally help maintain an acidic pH and inhibit the growth of pathogens. The loss of lactobacilli can lead to the overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Prevotella bivia, and Mobiluncus spp., resulting in bacterial vaginosis. BV is characterized by a shift from a healthy Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome to one dominated by anaerobic bacteria, leading to symptoms like odor, discharge, and irritation. BV has serious consequences on fertility if not regulated.
4. Health Implications
Body Odor The overgrowth of Corynebacterium and other odor-producing bacteria is worsened by polyester’s inability to wick away moisture. These bacteria metabolize sweat and sebum into malodorous compounds such as thioalcohols, which handle body odor. The lack of breathability in polyester fabrics prevents these compounds from evaporating, leading to a stronger, more persistent odor.
Skin Infections and Inflammation The increased presence of pathogenic bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus and reduced beneficial bacteria like Staphylococcus epidermidis due to polyester clothing can heighten the risk of skin infections, such as folliculitis or impetigo. Additionally, micro-abrasions caused by friction from polyester can serve as entry points for these pathogens, further increasing infection risk.
Seborrheic Dermatitis and Eczema Polyester clothing can cause irritation and exacerbate conditions like seborrheic dermatitis and eczema. The fabric's rough texture and moisture-trapping properties can irritate sensitive skin and disrupt the delicate balance of the skin microbiome, leading to flare-ups.
5. Microbiome Disruption Pathway
Moisture and Heat Retention Polyester traps sweat and heat against the skin, leading to increased moisture levels.
Anaerobic Environment Creation The trapped moisture creates a low-oxygen (anaerobic) environment that is favorable for the growth of certain bacteria, like Cutibacterium acnes and Corynebacterium species.
Imbalance in Microbial Populations Beneficial bacteria like Staphylococcus epidermidis and Lactobacillus species are suppressed due to the unfavorable environment, while pathogenic or odor-producing bacteria thrive.
Increased Inflammation and Infection Risk The overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria and the irritation caused by polyester fabric increase the risk of skin inflammation, infections, and conditions such as acne, folliculitis, or bacterial vaginosis.
Polyester fabric promotes the growth of unfavorable bacteria on human skin by creating a warm, moist, and low-oxygen environment, which is ideal for pathogenic and odor-causing bacteria like Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus aureus. This environment suppresses beneficial bacteria, like Staphylococcus epidermidis and Lactobacillus species, leading to microbial imbalances. These imbalances can affect sebum production, exacerbate skin conditions like acne, increase the risk of infections, and lead to conditions like bacterial vaginosis. Choosing natural, breathable fabrics like cotton or linen can help maintain a healthier skin microbiome by allowing better airflow and reducing moisture buildup.
Cold Plunges in Polyester: Freezing Your Body, Filling It with Plastic
Braving icy waters like a Nordic goddess, you shock your system to life – but here’s the catch: if you are plunging in polyester, you’re diving right into a microplastic soup. You see, polyester is not just any fabric; it is a type of plastic that sheds microfibers faster than a nervous chihuahua sheds fur. And when you hit that cold water, your fabric contracts and loosens, releasing these tiny particles straight into your skin, cozying up in your bloodstream like it is a spa day. Forget inflammation reduction: your polyester gear is hosting a microplastic party in your veins.
Inhale... Microplastics
Every warrior pose, every downward dog, every single glorious stretch is sending a flurry of plastic microfibers into the air. That’s right, you are sweating it out in a cloud of tiny plastics.
Take a breath; what do you feel? Inner peace? Try polyester particles tickling your lungs. Researchers have already found these sneaky microplastics lodged in human lung tissue, and you’re over here inhaling like you’ve got nothing better to breathe in. Your practice is supposed to cleanse and heal, but your polyester leggings are flipping the script, making your insides a bit more… synthetic.
Polyester: The Plastic Disaster You Wear
Let’s get this straight: polyester is a sneaky little plastic, disguising itself as fitness-friendly fabric. Sure, it’s marketed as “high-performance,” but performance at what? Filling your body with microplastics?
Check.
Leaching hormone-disrupting chemicals like phthalates and bisphenols into your skin?
Double-check.
You are in a toxic relationship with your wardrobe, and it is time to break up.
You ditch plastic straws, swear off single-use bags, and then drape yourself in polyester? Oh, microbes, you are smarter than that. The health industry has sold you a lie, wrapped in shiny, stretchy, sweat-wicking plastic. And while you’re out here paying premium prices for it, you are paying even more with your health. Wake up and smell the microplastics.
The Polyester Weight Trap: You’re Working Out, But Your Clothes Are Working Against You
You are doing everything right; eating clean, counting your macros, and hitting the gym five days a week. But every time you slide into those polyester yoga pants, you are basically putting on a suit of hormone disruptors that scream, "Let’s make fat storage fun again!"
Here’s the thing: polyester, spandex, and other synthetic fabrics are dripping with endocrine disruptors like phthalates and BPA, chemicals that mimic estrogen in your body.
You see, estrogen dominance isn’t just some abstract hormonal imbalance, it’s a metabolic monster. It slows down fat metabolism, encourages fat storage (especially in the hips, thighs, and belly), and leads to stubborn weight gain that laughs in the face of your diet and exercise efforts. You could be sweating buckets in that hot yoga class, but if your leggings are polyester-based, your fat cells are quietly singing, “I will survive!”
Estrogen Dominance and the Fat-Storage Party in Your Pants
Polyester and other synthetic fabrics do more than just wick away sweat; they gift-wrap your body in microplastics and chemical estrogens that make themselves right at home in your fat cells. And here’s the kicker: once these bad boys settle in, they’re not going anywhere. They’re like that clingy ex who just won’t take the hint – they stay put, causing long-term estrogen dominance.
Now, what does estrogen dominance do exactly? Let’s look at the greatest hits:
Promotes fat storage, particularly in the hips, thighs, and abdomen (just where you didn’t want it).
Causes bloating, water retention, and that lovely puffiness that makes you feel like a human marshmallow.
Leads to mood swings and sugar cravings – because why not make you crave everything that’ll make the situation worse?
So while you’re in your favorite polyester yoga set, trying to shed pounds, your body is busy turning every extra calorie into another reason you can’t zip up those jeans.
Permanent Fat Cell Residence: Your Workout Clothes’ Dirty Secret
It’s one thing to know your workout clothes are full of endocrine disruptors, but it’s another to realize they make themselves at home in your fat cells forever. That’s right: once these synthetic estrogens get absorbed through your skin, they’re not interested in leaving. They settle down, redecorate, and set up shop permanently.
This means even if you go on a strict diet and finally get the scale to budge, those endocrine disruptors are still lurking, ready to sabotage your progress the moment you take a break from your routine. It's the ultimate irony: the very clothes designed to help you lose weight are ensuring you stay stuck in the cycle of estrogen-driven fat gain.
Workout Gear That Keeps You Fat
Isn’t it a riot that we’re all running around in “performance” fabrics that are actively contributing to the very weight gain we’re trying to combat? It's like training for a marathon while inhaling donuts the whole way through. You’re dedicated, determined, and disciplined – but if you’re doing it in polyester, you’re pretty much the punchline in a cosmic joke.
Here’s the bottom line: those trendy synthetic leggings might be flattering, but they’re also feeding the fat-storage beast. Order your next outfit without a side of hormonal sabotage.
Level Up My Mystical Microbes
Now that you know polyester is playing you for a fool, it’s time to make better choices. Here’s the game plan, straight up:
Feel fabulous, darling..
Mary’s favorites:
Silk jersey: This fabric looks like and feels like a t-shirt but is made from 100% silk. It’s antimicrobial (aka doesn’t smell), regulates body temperature in heat AND in the cold, doesn’t wrinkle, and can do no wrong.
Merino Wool: Naturally antimicrobial, moisture-wicking, and comes in several weights for hot and cold weather.
Lamb leather: That’s right! You may have noticed that an unusual percentage of my clothing is lightweight buttery lamb leather. History darlings, the original workout gear was leather. There is a reason for that.
The next time you reach for that shiny piece of polyester, ask yourself: am I really living my best life, or am I just another microbe trapped in plastic?
Sources:
- Bergman, Å., et al. (2013). State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization, 1–201.
- Buckley, J. P., et al. (2015). Exposure to Phthalates and Bisphenol A and Fetal Development. Environmental Research, 137, 295-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.01.003.
- Calafat, A. M., et al. (2008). Exposure of the U.S. Population to Bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-Octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(1), 39-44. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10753.
- Darbre, P. D. (2017). Endocrine Disruption and Human Health: A Personal Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1-16. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14121469.
- Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., et al. (2009). Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement. Endocrine Reviews, 30(4), 293–342. DOI: 10.1210/er.2009-0002.
- Galloway, T. S., et al. (2010). Plasticizers and Endocrine Disruption: A Role for Adipogenesis and Obesity. Endocrine Reviews, 31(6), 713-745. DOI: 10.1210/er.2009-0026.
- Giusti, R. M., et al. (1995). Environmental Estrogens: Endocrine Disruptors and the Health Implications of Exposure to Xenoestrogens. Environmental Health Perspectives, 103(7), 346-350. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103346.
- Gray, J. M., et al. (2017). The Effect of Environmental Exposures on Puberty in Human Populations. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1289/EHP398.
- Hatch, E. E., et al. (2010). Association of Endocrine Disruptors and Their Mechanisms of Action in Hormone-Related Cancers. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 95(8), 3528–3539. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-2085.
- Heindel, J. J., et al. (2009). The Obesogen Hypothesis: Current Status and Implications for Human Health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(6), 793-800. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11536.
- Hu, Y., et al. (2017). Bisphenol A and Phthalate Induced Endocrine Disruption and Role of High-Throughput Epigenomics. Genomics, 109(2), 91–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.01.002.
- Kannan, K., et al. (2017). Phthalates in Indoor Dust from Homes in Virginia and Their Association with Hormone Levels in Pregnant Women. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220(2), 112–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.11.003.
- La Merrill, M., & Birnbaum, L. S. (2011). Childhood Obesity and Environmental Chemicals. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine, 78(1), 22–48. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20222.
- Legler, J., & Brouwer, A. (2003). Are Brominated Flame Retardants Endocrine Disruptors? Environmental International, 29(6), 879-885. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00120-9.
- Liao, C., Liu, F., & Kannan, K. (2012). Bisphenol S, a New Bisphenol Analogue, in Paper Products and Currency Bills and Its Association with Bisphenol A Residues. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(12), 6515–6522. DOI: 10.1021/es300876n.
- Meeker, J. D., & Ferguson, K. K. (2014). Relationship Between Urinary Phthalate and Bisphenol A Concentrations and Serum Thyroid Measures in U.S. Adults and Adolescents from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2008. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(8), 927-933. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307673.
- Muncke, J. (2009). Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Compounds via the Food Chain: Is Packaging a Relevant Source? Science of the Total Environment, 407(16), 4549-4559. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.006.
- Rüegg, J., et al. (2011). Bisphenol A: Inducing Endocrine Disruption Through Epigenetic Pathways. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 18(2), 53–66. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-11-0020.
- Shafei, A., et al. (2018). Plastics, EDCs, and the Developing Brain. Endocrinology, 159(2), 353–369. DOI: 10.1210/en.2017-00645.
- Sirohi, R., et al. (2020). Microplastics as an Emerging Pollutant in Soil and Water: Insights into Source, Transformation, and Distribution Pathway. Environmental Pollution, 267, 115529. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115529.
- Soto, A. M., & Sonnenschein, C. (2010). Environmental Causes of Cancer: Endocrine Disruptors as Carcinogens. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 6(7), 363–370. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.87.
- Thompson, R. C., et al. (2009). Plastic Debris in the Marine Environment: Consequences for Marine Life and Humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2013–2026. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0265.
- Vandenberg, L. N., et al. (2012). Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses. Endocrine Reviews, 33(3), 378–455. DOI: 10.1210/er.2011-1050.
- Wang, J., et al. (2019). Bisphenol A and Hormone-Associated Cancers: Current Progress and Perspectives. Reproductive Toxicology, 91, 24–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.07.008.
- Warhurst, A. M., & Sunderland, T. (1996). Endocrine Disruption and Chemical Risk Assessment: The Risks of Endocrine Disruption to Reproductive Health and the Environment. Ecotoxicology, 5(1), 123-142. DOI: 10.1007/BF00118992.
- Wormuth, M., et al. (2006). What Are the Sources of Exposure to Eight Frequently Used Phthalates in Europeans? Risk Analysis, 26(3), 803-824. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00770.x.
- Zota, A. R., et al. (2014). Phthalates and Female Reproductive Health: Evidence from Animals and Humans. Environmental Research, 135, 116-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.002.
- Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). Effects of Bisphenol A on Adipocyte Differentiation, Lipid Accumulation, and Gene Expression in Mouse Pre-Adipocyte Cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 126, 80-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.031.